Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/25/1997

Doe v. Pataki

Citations

  • 120 F.3d 1263
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “application of the registration and notification provisions of the SORA to persons who committed their offenses prior to the January 21, 1996, effective date of the Act does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause”
  • \We therefore decline to construe the subjective intent expressed by one or more legislators to reflect the objective intent of the legislature.\ (quotation omitted)
  • “For all sex offenders sentenced or released from a state correctional or mental institution after the effective date of the [(SORA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.