Second Circuit· 9/25/1997
Doe v. Pataki
Citations
- 120 F.3d 1263
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “application of the registration and notification provisions of the SORA to persons who committed their offenses prior to the January 21, 1996, effective date of the Act does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause”
- \We therefore decline to construe the subjective intent expressed by one or more legislators to reflect the objective intent of the legislature.\ (quotation omitted)
- “For all sex offenders sentenced or released from a state correctional or mental institution after the effective date of the [(SORA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 406×
- Femedeer v. HaunTenth Circuit· 2000-08-28· cited 290×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- Doe v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
- State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-02-21· cited 155×
- State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-01· cited 154×
- People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-30· cited 115×
- Doe v. Dept. of Public Safety ex rel. LeeSecond Circuit· 2001-10-19· cited 88×
- Cornelio v. ConnecticutSecond Circuit· 2022-04-26· cited 56×
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-08-04· cited 54×
- Ralph Abed v. John J. Armstrong, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of ConnecticutSecond Circuit· 2000-04-03· cited 53×
- Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 53×
- People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-11-09· cited 52×
- Spencer v. O'CONNORIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-30· cited 51×
- State v. Blankenship (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-12· cited 50×
- Lanni v. EnglerE.D. Michigan· 1998-02-13· cited 46×
- Barna v. TravisSecond Circuit· 2001-02-02· cited 41×
- United States ex rel. Bilotta v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.S.D. New York· 2014-09-30· cited 39×
- Doe v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 2007-03-08· cited 39×
- Brokamp v. JamesSecond Circuit· 2023-04-27· cited 39×
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 3,761×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 2,142×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court· 1977-06-28· cited 1,340×
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court· 1925-11-23· cited 945×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.