Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency’s interpretation may not be entitled to deference if an alternative interpretation “is compelled by the regulation’s plain language”
• holding that courts must “give substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”
• holding that the APA standard is “incorporated by” the judicial review section of the Social Security Act
• holding that the Department of Health and Human Services’ interpretation of a regulation must be given “controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation”
• holding that courts “must give substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”
• holding that “agency’s interpretation must be given controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).