Skip to main content
· 3/12/2015

Dino Kyzar v. Charles Ryan

Citations

  • 780 F.3d 940
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3930
  • 2015 WL 1061892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Kyzar has not attempted to overcome the presumption that his claim was adjudicated on the merits in state court, so AEDPA’s deferential standards of review govern this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berzon, Rawlinson, Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.