Ninth Circuit· 3/19/2010

United States v. Nevils

Citations

598 F.3d 1158
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5696
2010 WL 986790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence must be sufficient to allow any rational trier of fact to convict
stating that where jury was entitled to make credibility determination, court must assume it did so in a way that supports their verdict
holding that, “when faced with a record of historical facts that supports conflicting inferences a reviewing court must presume . . . that the trier of fact resolved any such conflicts in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution”
noting that a reviewing court “must presume—even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record—that the trier of fact resolved any [conflicting inferences] in favor of the prosecution” (quotation omitted)
overruling precedents that “strayed from the test established in Jackson, and made ‘plausible’ .exculpatory constructions” of the evidence
requiring the defendant to “point[] to evidence so supportive of innocence that no rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Rymer, Thomas, Silverman, Fisher, Gould, Tallman, Rawlinson, Clifton, Smith, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Nevils

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.