Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert Lampert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circumstances were insufficient to alert the state appellate court that petitioner was seeking review of a particular federal issue
• holding that “for purposes of exhaustion, a citation to a state case analyzing a federal constitutional issue serves the same purpose as a citation to a federal case analyzing such an issue”
• noting failure to fairly present federal claim coupled with time limits for filing petition for review procedurally defaults the claim, requiring a showing of cause and prejudice
• noting failure to fairly present federal claim coupled with time limits for filing petition for review procedurally defaults the claim, requiring a showing of cause and prejudice
• suggesting pro se petitions should be read more liberally than counseled 11 petitions when evaluating whether a claim was exhausted
• suggesting pro se petitions should be read more liberally than counseled petitions when 13 evaluating whether a claim was exhausted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).