Ninth Circuit· 2/14/2003
Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert Lampert
Citations
- 319 F.3d 1153
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1785
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1381
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2715
- 2003 WL 329005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the circumstances were insufficient to alert the state appellate court that petitioner was seeking review of a particular federal issue
- holding that “for purposes of exhaustion, a citation to a state case analyzing a federal constitutional issue serves the same purpose as a citation to a federal case analyzing such an issue”
- noting failure to fairly present federal claim coupled with time limits for filing petition for review procedurally defaults the claim, requiring a showing of cause and prejudice
- noting failure to fairly present federal claim coupled with time limits for filing petition for review procedurally defaults the claim, requiring a showing of cause and prejudice
- suggesting pro se petitions should be read more liberally than counseled 11 petitions when evaluating whether a claim was exhausted
- suggesting pro se petitions should be read more liberally than counseled petitions when 13 evaluating whether a claim was exhausted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Kozinski, Trott, Kleinfeld, Tashima, Thomas, McKeown, Wardlaw, Fletcher, Gould, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-02-24· cited 362×
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreNinth Circuit· 2004-10-12· cited 307×
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanNinth Circuit· 2014-01-23· cited 253×
- Wooten v. KirklandNinth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 239×
- Davis v. SilvaNinth Circuit· 2008-01-02· cited 179×
- Cook v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2008-08-13· cited 108×
- Jones v. Sussex I State PrisonFourth Circuit· 2010-01-15· cited 89×
- Vincent L. Fields v. Doug WaddingtonNinth Circuit· 2005-03-21· cited 85×
- Steven H. Caswell v. Arthur Calderon, WardenNinth Circuit· 2004-03-18· cited 56×
- Jason Wayne Rose v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 2005-01-24· cited 52×
- Daniel L. Sanders v. Leslie RyderNinth Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 44×
- Cindy Lee Galvan v. The Alaska Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2005-02-09· cited 39×
- Kargus v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-10-15· cited 39×
- Jerome Powell v. John LambertNinth Circuit· 2004-02-10· cited 35×
- Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenNinth Circuit· 2014-08-18· cited 35×
- Dino Kyzar v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-03-12· cited 35×
- Michael Ray Lounsbury v. Frank S. ThompsonNinth Circuit· 2004-06-29· cited 29×
- Roberts v. DiCarloC.D. California· 2003-12-10· cited 24×
- Jesse Andrews v. Kevin ChappellNinth Circuit· 2015-08-05· cited 21×
- Rollins v. Superior Court of Los AngelesC.D. California· 2010-03-23· cited 20×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,714×
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 2,630×
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodNinth Circuit· 1999-10-29· cited 856×
- William Daye v. Attorney General of the State of New York and Eugene Le Fevre, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1982-12-09· cited 826×
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 634×
- Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyThird Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 556×
- Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.First Circuit· 1994-10-18· cited 374×
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 290×
- Peter M. Gatlin v. M.K. Madding, Warden Attorney General of the State of California People of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 237×
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 232×
- Juan Verdin v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. HartiganSeventh Circuit· 1992-08-28· cited 228×
- Phillip Jackson Lyons v. Jackie CrawfordNinth Circuit· 2000-11-13· cited 213×
- Lyons v. CrawfordNinth Circuit· 2000-11-13· cited 185×
- William B. Greene v. John LambertNinth Circuit· 2002-03-26· cited 173×
- Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 1994-07-07· cited 156×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.