Skip to main content
· 1/7/2004

Henry L. Conway, Jr., Claimant-Appellee v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 1369
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 115
  • 2004 WL 32855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this Court may not refuse to take into account the rule of prejudicial error
  • holding that this Court may not refuse to take into account the rule of prejudicial error
  • concluding that the Court must \'take due account of the rule of prejudicial error'\
  • concluding that Court not obligated to address expressly \rule of prejudicial error in each and every opinion\; however, Court cannot \flatly refuse[] to 'take due account of the rule of prejudicial error'\
  • holding that VCAA notice errors are reviewed under a prejudicial error rule
  • Lack of jurisdiction existed where the Veterans Court statement that § 5103(a) had not been “properly administered” was not an interpretation of section § 5103(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Clevenger, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.