Hartman v. Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a claim for service connection has been proven, the purpose of § 5103(a) has been satisfied, and notice under its provisions has been satisfied
• discussing an opinion of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
• “That the court did not specifically mention [an argument] in its opinion forms no basis for an assumption that it did not consider [it].” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).