· 12/19/2002
Kay v. Principi
Citations
- 16 Vet. App. 529
- 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 998
- 2002 WL 31833717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement'to benefit sought
- stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought
- stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to benefit sought
- stating that, on remand, the Board 11 must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to benefit sought
- stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought
- stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farley, Ivers, Steinberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.