Skip to main content
· 12/19/2002

Kay v. Principi

Citations

  • 16 Vet. App. 529
  • 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 998
  • 2002 WL 31833717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement'to benefit sought
  • stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought
  • stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to benefit sought
  • stating that, on remand, the Board 11 must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to benefit sought
  • stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought
  • stating that, on remand, the Board must consider additional evidence and argument in assessing entitlement to the benefit sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Ivers, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.