Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/15/1980

Dilley v. Alexander

Citations

  • 200 U.S. App. D.C. 354
  • 627 F.2d 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the district court’s role in implementing a mandate as “a shared responsibility” with the court of appeals
  • “[CJlaims for reimbursed allowances for post exchange and commissary privileges ... appear to be speculative in amount, hence should not have awarded.”
  • “Faced with the district court’s apparent uncertainty concerning our mandate, and the plainly erroneous interpretation of the Army, we would be remiss were we to abandon our decision that we reached in the appellants’ favor”
  • original panel recalled and clarified mandate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacKinnon, Robb, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.