Barnick v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reservist who “had only been on temporary active duty assignments” and “was on inactive status at the time of the improper action” was not constructively active
• holding the Court will not disturb the decision of the ABCMR unless it was “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence”
• finding a statute not money-mandating because it merely permits certain payments “if the Secretary determines that it is in the interests of fairness and equity”
• refusing to provide pay beyond the date a service member would have been “found unfit for duty due to physical disability, and either retired or discharged”
• finding the claimant “would still have been discharged at that time for physical disability”
• reviewing a decision of the AFBCMR denying plaintiff back pay and disability benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).