International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. Donovan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that enforcement of a court’s mandate “is particularly appropriate in a case . . . where an administrative agency plainly neglects the terms of [the] mandate”
• noting that “authority is retained by the District Court” to enforce the circuit’s mandate
• rejecting Labor Secretary’s attempt to avoid judgment of court by promulgation of new “emergency” regulation
• where the Secretary of Labor “simply reimplemented precisely the same rule that [the D.C. Circuit] vacated as ‘arbitrary and capricious’ in its first decision”
• “The power of an original panel to grant relief enforcing the terms of its earlier mandate is clearly established in this Circuit[.]”
• Secretary of Labor's attempt to \reimplement[ ] precisely the same rule that this court vacated as 'arbitrary and capricious' \ conflicts with \interest of the judicial branch in seeing that an unambiguous mandate is not blatantly disregarded\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).