Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 2/8/1984

Liddell v. Missouri

Citations

  • 731 F.2d 1294
  • 76 A.L.R. Fed. 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the doctrine protects settled expectations of parties, ensures uniformity of decisions and promotes judicial efficiency
  • the doctrine protects settled expectations of parties, ensures uniformity of decisions and promotes judicial efficiency
  • District Court may impose tax “after exploration of every other fiscal alternative”
  • District Court may impose tax \after exploration of every other fiscal alternative\
  • “The remedy must therefore be related to ‘the condition alleged to offend the Constitution.’” (citing Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 280–281 (1977) (Milliken II)) (emphasis in original)
  • Judge John R. Gibson, dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Heaney, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Liddell v. Missouri

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.