Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 7/15/2009

Denson v. United States

Citations

  • 574 F.3d 1318
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15634
  • 2009 WL 2031036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district courts should deny a Rule 60(b) motion attacking a non-final order “for the obvious reason that the . . . order [is] not final”
  • rejecting argument that district court failed to make ex- press determination of no just reason for delay because the Rule 54(b
  • rejecting argument that district court failed to make ex- press determination of no just reason for delay because the Rule 54(b
  • noting that “government officials lack discretion to violate constitutional rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Carnes, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

95 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.