Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, in the absence of a statutory definition, statutory terms are construed in accordance with their ordinary or natural meaning
• recognizing that, in the absence of a statutory definition, statutory terms are construed in accordance with their ordinary or natural meaning
• holding that a plaintiff's FTCA claim must be based on a state-law tort claim and cannot be based on a federal constitutional or statutory claim against the Government
• holding that a Bivens cause of action cannot be maintained against a federal agency
• holding that constitutional tort claim (for alleged violation of due process rights) is not “cognizable” under FTCA, § 1346(b)
• holding that federal agencies, such as the FDIC, were immune from Bivens actions alleging a violation of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).