Skip to main content
· 6/1/1976

Mathews v. Diaz

Citations

  • 426 U.S. 67
  • 96 S. Ct. 1883
  • 48 L. Ed. 2d 478
  • 1976 U.S. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Congress may lawfully distinguish between citizens and aliens in its provision of benefits
  • distinguishing Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365, 91 S.Ct. 1848, 29 L.Ed.2d 534 (1971
  • fact that government treats aliens differently from citizens not sufficient to show that such disparate treatment is “invidious”
  • the Fifth Amendment protects aliens from unlawful discrimination by the federal government
  • administrative remedy not required when issue presented beyond competency of the agency
  • aliens are afforded protection under the Fifth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.