Skip to main content
· 11/27/2007

Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland Security

Citations

  • 510 F.3d 1
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27334
  • 2007 WL 4171244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that, for purposes of a different provision of § 1252, “relating to” could be used to mean “to sweep within its scope claims with only a remote or attenuated connection” to the underlying removal
  • suggesting that, for purposes of a different provision of § 1252, “relating to” could be used to mean “to sweep within its scope claims with only a remote or attenuated connection” to the underlying removal
  • “[T]he legislative history indicates that Congress intended to create an exception for claims ‘independent’ of removal.”
  • \[R]emoval proceedings are confined to determining whether a particular alien should be deported.\
  • “Given the degree of contact between [the voice identification witnesses] and [the defendant], we accord very little weight to the fact that most of it occurred ten or twelve years prior to [the defendant’s] arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Selya, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.