Ninth Circuit· 2/2/1994
Demont R.D. Conner v. Theodore Sakai
Citations
- 15 F.3d 1463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the “‘amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter 16 being treated thereafter as non-existent.’”
- summary judgment appropriate where plaintiff failed to connect defendants with constitutional violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Norris, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Elmer PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND; James Gomez, Director; Daniel Vasquez; Robert Borg, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1995-09-18· cited 957×
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictE.D. California· 2001-03-13· cited 263×
- Madrid v. GomezN.D. California· 1995-01-10· cited 115×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-02· cited 91×
- Sabil M. MUJAHID, AKA Terry Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kevin MEYER, Correctional Officer, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1995-07-10· cited 72×
- McDermott v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSMontana Supreme Court· 2001-07-24· cited 31×
- Allah v. PooleW.D. New York· 2007-08-14· cited 25×
- Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of AgricultureE.D. California· 2004-03-11· cited 19×
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesE.D. California· 2001-06-26· cited 18×
- United States v. CrispE.D. California· 1999-11-03· cited 17×
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. BadgleyE.D. California· 2000-06-28· cited 13×
- United States v. BellE.D. California· 1998-09-29· cited 12×
- United States v. BergE.D. California· 1999-10-05· cited 11×
- Lopez v. SmithNinth Circuit· 1998-11-09· cited 10×
- Wilson v. City of Fountain ValleyC.D. California· 2004-03-23· cited 9×
- Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesE.D. California· 2001-03-28· cited 7×
- Witherow v. CrawfordD. Nevada· 2006-12-28· cited 7×
- Robert E. Banks v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-12· cited 6×
- Cody v. JonesN.D. New York· 1995-07-28· cited 5×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 4,123×
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court· 1991-11-05· cited 4,063×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveNinth Circuit· 1988-04-04· cited 1,659×
- Taylor v. ListNinth Circuit· 1989-07-17· cited 931×
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 896×
- Kenneth McClure Young, II v. Warren Kann and Jane DoeThird Circuit· 1991-03-05· cited 246×
- Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. Peter Carlson, WardenNinth Circuit· 1989-09-07· cited 206×
- McGonigle v. CombsNinth Circuit· 1992-06-19· cited 162×
- Sands v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1989-09-29· cited 43×
- United States v. Wilson BigmanNinth Circuit· 1990-06-18· cited 41×
- Franco v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-12-04· cited 33×
Other cases named Demont R.D. Conner v. Theodore Sakai
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.