United States v. Petrillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting vagueness challenge to statute making it a crime to coerce the employment of \persons in excess of the number of employees needed\
• rejecting vagueness challenge to statute making it a crime to-coerce the employment of “persons in excess of the number of employees needed”
• invalidating a statute where clearer and more precise language could have been easily used
• invalidating a statute where clearer and more precise language could have been easily used
• upholding the constitutionality of a Communications Act provision making it a crime to coerce a radio-broadcasting licensee to employ \in excess of the number of employees needed by such licensee to perform actual services\
• upholding a law against a void-for-vagueness challenge because no “clearer and more precise language_ occurs to us, nor has any better language been suggested, effectively to carry out what appears to have been the Congressional purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Petrillo

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Petrillo
  N.D. Illinois· 1948-01-14· cited 7×
• United States v. Petrillo
  N.D. Illinois· 1946-12-02· cited 7×
• United States v. Petrillo
  S.D. New York· 1999-08-09· cited 3×
• United States v. Petrillo
  Third Circuit· 1978-08-02