S.D. California· 1/26/2001
DeMarco v. DepoTech Corp.
Citations
- 149 F. Supp. 2d 1212
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5336
- 2001 WL 850049
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that expert affidavit did not qualify as a written instrument and was 13 not incorporated into complaint pursuant to Rule 10(c)
- considering a request to strike 3 pursuant to Rule 10(c) in relation to a motion to dismiss
- striking expert opinion attached to complaint in securities fraud case under Rule 10
- allowing plaintiffs to rely on an expert's opinion in order to state securities claims requires a court to \confront a myriad of complex evidentiary issues not generally capable of resolution at the pleading stage\
- “Although Plaintiffs may have established a legitimate difference in opinion as to the1 proper statistical analysis,- they have hardly stated a securities fraud claim.”
- “Conclusory allegations and speculation carry no additional weight merely because a plaintiff placed them within the affidavit of a retained expert.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whelan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 2,266×
- Kleinman v. Elan Corp., plcSecond Circuit· 2013-02-01· cited 278×
- Inter-Local Pension Fund Gcc/i v. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-09-06· cited 215×
- Financial Acquisition Partners LP v. BlackwellFifth Circuit· 2006-02-14· cited 201×
- American Casein Co. v. Geiger (In Re Geiger)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-09-29· cited 103×
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationS.D. California· 2010-04-21· cited 29×
- In re Egalet Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-08-02· cited 29×
- Ong v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-03-22· cited 27×
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationE.D. New York· 2008-04-30· cited 25×
- Mannkind Securities ActionsC.D. California· 2011-12-16· cited 18×
- In Re Peerless Systems, Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. California· 2002-01-14· cited 13×
- Rasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.S.D. California· 2006-05-19· cited 11×
- Lerner v. Northwest BiotherapeuticsD. Maryland· 2017-03-31· cited 11×
- West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2014-09-29· cited 10×
- Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Adecco S.A.S.D. California· 2005-05-16· cited 8×
- In re Maxwell Technologies, Inc., Securities LitigationS.D. California· 2014-05-05· cited 6×
- Ramirez ex rel. Situated v. Exxon Mobil Corp.N.D. Texas· 2018-08-14· cited 6×
- In Re Atlas Mining Co., Securities LitigationD. Idaho· 2009-09-25· cited 5×
- In re Empyrean Biosciences, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2003-07-02· cited 4×
- Kleinman v. Elan Corp., plcSecond Circuit· 2013-02-05
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationNinth Circuit· 1990-02-22· cited 2,784×
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaNinth Circuit· 1994-01-12· cited 1,208×
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1983-10-18· cited 858×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 794×
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 748×
- Rose v. BartleThird Circuit· 1989-03-20· cited 728×
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 639×
- Kramer v. Time Warner IncSecond Circuit· 1991-06-27· cited 603×
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 577×
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1984-12-10· cited 556×
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationNinth Circuit· 1994-12-09· cited 541×
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-12· cited 530×
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingNinth Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 441×
- Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.First Circuit· 1999-10-08· cited 440×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 412×
- Kay Hollinger Richard Llewelyn Jones Edward E. Nissen Judy D'Arcy K-Judy, Ltd. v. Titan Capital Corp. Emil Wilkowski Painter Financial Group, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1990-11-13· cited 344×
- Cooper v. PickettNinth Circuit· 1998-01-30· cited 276×
Other cases named DeMarco v. DepoTech Corp.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.