Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he fact that a party was named in the original complaint 2 is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the original”
• holding that the district court erred by entering judgment against a party named in the initial complaint, but not in the amended complaint
• holding that “[t]he fact that a party was named in the original complaint is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the original”
• noting that a 24 Court may not look beyond the four corners of a complaint in ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) 25 motion to dismiss
• holding that “an amended pleading supersedes the original”
• upholding admission of SEC Registration Statement under Fed. R. Evid. 803(24)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).