Rasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing fraud claims under Rule 9(b) because the plaintiff failed to “specifically identify who made the false statements, where the false statements were made and, most importantly, why the alleged false statements were false and misleading”
• “In determining 16 whether diversity jurisdiction exists, a court is obligated to consider claims for both actual 17 and punitive damages in determining the jurisdictional amount.”
• “Plaintiff provides these damage values without any comment as to how he is entitled to these damages, or what connection these extremely large damages amounts have with the alleged claims”
• “Plaintiff provides these damage values without any comment as to how he is entitled to these damages, or what connection these extremely large damages amounts have with the alleged claims.”
• “Plaintiff provides these damage values without any comment as to how he is entitled to these damages, or what connection these extremely large damages amounts have with the alleged claims”
• “Plaintiff provides these damage values without any comment as to how he is entitled to these damages, or what connection these extremely large damages amounts have with the alleged claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).