Skip to main content
· 5/30/1975

Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 230 N.W.2d 588
  • 304 Minn. 275
  • 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 16
  • 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating court has inherent power to sua sponte summarily dispose of case in which no genuine issue of material fact exists
  • “Promissory estoppel is the name applied to a contract implied in law where no contract exists in fact.”
  • “[E]quitable estoppel is akin to fraud. It does require a representation or concealment of material facts.”
  • promissory estoppel may be used to remove an oral contract from the statute of frauds
  • promissory estoppel may be used to remove an oral contract from the statute of frauds
  • “Promissory estoppel is the name applied to a contract implied in law where no contract exists in fact”, and thus doctrine is wholly inapplicable in situations where an actual contract exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nicholas S. Chanak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.