Skip to main content
· 4/16/1976

Jurek v. Thompson

Citations

  • 241 N.W.2d 788
  • 308 Minn. 191
  • 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a principal \retains some right of control\ over an agent
  • stating that the parties in a principal–agent relationship “are in a fiduciary relationship and the principal retains some right of control”
  • rejecting jury's finding of agency where evidence of \defendant's right of control * * * is totally lacking\
  • rejecting jury’s finding of agency where evidence of “defendant’s right of control * * ⅜ is totally lacking”
  • no agency relationship absent, inter alia, manifestation of alleged agent’s consent to act as an agent
  • agency requires persuasive evidence of affirmative manifestation of control or fiduciary relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.