· 4/16/1976
Jurek v. Thompson
Citations
- 241 N.W.2d 788
- 308 Minn. 191
- 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66
- 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1742
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a principal \retains some right of control\ over an agent
- stating that the parties in a principal–agent relationship “are in a fiduciary relationship and the principal retains some right of control”
- rejecting jury's finding of agency where evidence of \defendant's right of control * * * is totally lacking\
- rejecting jury’s finding of agency where evidence of “defendant’s right of control * * ⅜ is totally lacking”
- no agency relationship absent, inter alia, manifestation of alleged agent’s consent to act as an agent
- agency requires persuasive evidence of affirmative manifestation of control or fiduciary relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, MacLaughlin, Yetka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.