Skip to main content
· 2/9/1972

Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.

Citations

  • 493 P.2d 1220
  • 16 Ariz. App. 415
  • 56 A.L.R. 3d 1028
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 393
  • 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that equitable estoppel involves a misrepresentation of present 12 fact(s) and a party relying on this misrepresentation can only use equitable estoppel as a 13 defense when the misrepresenting party makes a claim against him
  • allowing application of promissory estoppel only when there has been a misrepresentation that the Statute of Frauds has been complied with or there has been a promise to make a memorandum of an oral agreement
  • major distinction between equitable estoppel and promissory es-toppel is that equitable estoppel is available only as a defense
  • Subcontractor’s bid mistakenly calculated on wrong type of highway chip
  • “sealcoat chips” for highway project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donofrio, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.