Lunning v. Land O'Lakes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that the evidence was insufficient to create a jury question on the issue of promissory estoppel where a written contract existed
• stating that the only exception permitting a promissory-estoppel claim when a written contract exists is for a promise to reduce a contract to writing
• defining equitable estoppel based on party “conduct,” including “acts, language or silence”
• “There is no need to imply a contract ... [when] both parties agree that a contract did exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).