S.D. New York· 12/3/1985
Dean v. Coughlin
Citations
- 623 F. Supp. 392
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “dental needs” accompanied by, inter alia, pain, discomfort, and “serious health consequences” constitute “serious medical needs as the law defines that term”
- concluding that where pain and discomfort are alleged “restorative services” such as filling cavities, doing root canal work, and crowning broken teeth are “serious medical needs as the law defines that term”
- “Even if prison officials give inmates access to treatment, they may still be deliberately indifferent to inmates’ needs if they fail to provide prescribed treatment.”
- “Inmates’ . . . dental needs—for fillings, crowns, and the like—are serious medical needs as the law defines that term.”
- “Even if prison officials give inmates access to treatment, they may still be deliberately indifferent to inmates’ needs if they fail to provide prescribed treatment.”
- “In- mates’ [ ] dental needs [ ] for fillings, crowns, and the like [ ] are serious medical needs as the law defines the term.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kram
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chance v. ArmstrongSecond Circuit· 1998-05-07· cited 822×
- Harrison v. BarkleySecond Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 513×
- Clarkson v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1995-06-16· cited 79×
- Banks v. YorkDistrict of Columbia· 2007-09-17· cited 40×
- Rivera v. GoordS.D. New York· 2000-09-26· cited 40×
- Zuck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-15· cited 29×
- Casey v. LewisD. Arizona· 1993-03-19· cited 21×
- Baughman v. GarciaS.D. Texas· 2017-05-26· cited 14×
- Farinaro v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1986-08-06· cited 10×
- Gunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-05-05· cited 3×
- Office of Inmate Advocacy v. FauverNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-02-01· cited 3×
- Chambers v. NH PRISOND. New Hampshire· 2007-12-13· cited 3×
- Dean v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1986-04-01· cited 2×
- Goodnow v. PalmD. Vermont· 2003-05-23· cited 2×
- Dean v. Coughlin IIISecond Circuit· 1986-10-28
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court· 1974-04-29· cited 2,649×
- Wali v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1985-02-05· cited 264×
- Jack Kahn Music Co., Inc. v. Baldwin Piano & Organ CompanySecond Circuit· 1979-08-01· cited 187×
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. FahySupreme Court· 1977-01-24· cited 157×
- Bowen v. Gary-Northwest Indiana Women's Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 157×
- Todaro v. WardSecond Circuit· 1977-10-31· cited 124×
- Jacobson & Company, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanySecond Circuit· 1977-01-25· cited 110×
- Norcott Corby v. J. P. Conboy, SuperintendentSecond Circuit· 1972-03-15· cited 90×
- National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 81×
- Stokes v. HurdleD. Maryland· 1975-03-26· cited 71×
- Church v. HegstromSecond Circuit· 1969-10-09· cited 61×
- Jere Bishop v. Kent R. Stoneman, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of Vermont, and Julius v. Moeykens, Warden, Vermont State PrisonSecond Circuit· 1974-12-04· cited 55×
- Fields v. GanderEighth Circuit· 1984-05-23· cited 54×
- Chapman v. RhodesS.D. Ohio· 1977-06-29· cited 50×
- Todaro v. WardS.D. New York· 1977-04-25· cited 36×
- Barnes v. Government of the Virgin IslandsVirgin Islands· 1976-05-20· cited 30×
- Nicholson v. Choctaw County, Ala.S.D. Alabama· 1980-09-25· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.