Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/5/1985

Wali v. Coughlin

Citations

  • 754 F.2d 1015
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a mandatory injunction “should issue only upon a clear showing that the moving party is entitled to the relief requested, or where extreme or very serious damage will result form a denial of preliminary relief”
  • noting that, “to establish that ... he is likely to prevail on the merits of the underlying controversy,” an applicant for injunctive relief “need only make a showing that the probability of his prevailing is better than fifty percent”
  • preliminary injunction with effect of granting disclosure of report would moot trial on the merits concerning entitlement to same report
  • “[S]uch a conclusion dictates virtually unbounded deference to a corrections official’s discretion, for there is no prisoner interest against which to balance it.”
  • First Amendment right to “receive information” entitled to special solicitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wali v. Coughlin

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.