Skip to main content
· 3/26/1975

Stokes v. Hurdle

Citations

  • 393 F. Supp. 757
  • 28 A.L.R. Fed. 270
  • 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • three-week delay in dental treatment which resulted in, at most, extraction of a tooth, was not a sufficiently substantial harm to support an Eighth Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blair

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.