Banks v. York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a former prisoner who had failed to complete all steps of the CCA’s formal grievance procedure failed to exhaust his administrative remedies properly prior to filing his lawsuit
• concluding that a former prisoner who had failed to complete all steps of the CCA’s formal grievance procedure failed to exhaust his administrative remedies properly prior to filing his lawsuit
• concluding that a plaintiff detained at the D.C. Jail was not entitled to placement at another facility under less restrictive conditions because “an inmate has no right to a particular place of confinement or level of security”
• “Notwithstanding his release, plaintiff was still incarcerated [when the action was filed], and he is therefore subject to the requirements of the PLRA.”
• rejecting detainee’s claim that he was entitled to placement at Correctional Treatment Facility rather than at the D.C. Jail where conditions were more restrictive
• reviewing cases and concluding that the general right not to be retaliated against for First Amendment conduct was clearly established, but such a right for informal oral complaints about matters not of public concern was not clearly established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).