· 6/29/1977
Chapman v. Rhodes
Citations
- 434 F. Supp. 1007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding double-celling unconstitutional despite a specific finding of no increase in violence due to the double-celling as opposed to the increase in population
- holding double-celling unconstitutional despite a specific finding of no increase in violence due to the double-celling as opposed to the increase in population
- declaring unconstitutional the double-celling of convicted prisoners
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.