Skip to main content
· 6/29/1977

Chapman v. Rhodes

Citations

  • 434 F. Supp. 1007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding double-celling unconstitutional despite a specific finding of no increase in violence due to the double-celling as opposed to the increase in population
  • holding double-celling unconstitutional despite a specific finding of no increase in violence due to the double-celling as opposed to the increase in population
  • declaring unconstitutional the double-celling of convicted prisoners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.