Skip to main content

Burns v. Burns

Citations

  • 847 S.W.2d 23
  • 312 Ark. 61
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that such benefits are not property
  • holding that such benefits are not property
  • declining to reverse our construction of the marital-property statute and leaving change, if any, in the word “property” to the General Assembly
  • declining to reverse our construction of the marital-property statute and leaving change, if any, in the word “property” to the General Assembly
  • factors are considered by chancellors when they exercise discretion in awarding alimony
  • factors are considered by chancellors when they exercise discretion in awarding alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Hays, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.