Day v. Day
Citations
- 71 Kan. 385
- 80 P. 974
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 149
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Divorce — Expenses of Wife. When a petition is filed for a divorce and alimony, or for alimony alone, the court may make such order relative to the expenses of the suit as will insure to the wife, an efficient preparation of her case, whether she is plaintiff or defendant in the suit.</p> <p>2. - Cohabitation after Adultery — Estoppel. When plaintiff alleges and offers testimony tending to show that his wife has been guilty of adultery, and it is disclosed that after learning of her misconduct he lived and cohabited with her for more than a year, he will be deemed to have condoned the offense, and it will not constitute a ground for divorce.</p> <p>3. --- One Offense as a Bar to Another. The right to set up one matrimonial offense in bar of another is an application of the equitable rule that one who invokes the aid of a court must come into it with a clear conscience and clean hands.</p> <p>4. -Plaintiff Must be Guiltless. Divorce is a remedy for the innocent and injured, and the plaintiff who has himself broken the marriage contract cannot ask to be relieved from its obligations because his spouse may also have broken it.</p> <p>, 5. - “Equal Wrong” Means Statutory, Not Moral, Wrong. When it is shown that each party to a suit has been guilty of a matrimonial offense which the statute has made a ground for divorce they will be deemed to be in “equal wrong,” and the court may in its discretion refuse to grant a divorce, although the offenses may not be of the same character.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Goetz v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-01-12· cited 27×
- Blankenship v. BlankenshipNevada Supreme Court· 1929-04-05· cited 17×
- Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-05-11· cited 7×
- Bovaird v. BovairdSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-06-06· cited 6×
- Egbers v. EgbersWashington Supreme Court· 1914-04-01· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ribet v. RibetSupreme Court of Alabama· 1864-01-15· cited 29×
- Nagel v. NagelSupreme Court of Missouri· 1848-07-15· cited 24×
- Bast v. BastIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-09-15· cited 24×
- Wheeler v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court· 1889-12-23· cited 18×
- Clapp v. ClappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1867-10-15· cited 15×
- Trowbridge v. CarlinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1857-08-15· cited 14×
- Cassidy v. CassidyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-05-08· cited 7×
- Morrison v. MorrisonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1895-05-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.