Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/2/1950
Day v. DAY
Citations
- 58 S.E.2d 83
- 216 S.C. 334
- 1950 S.C. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In our opinion, if it had been the intention of the legislature to sanction an adulterous relationship as constituting a basis of dependency, express provision would have been made therefor in the [Workers’] Compensation Act.”
- “A mere marriage ceremony between a man and a woman, where one of them has a living wife or husband, is not a marriage at all. Such a marriage is absolutely void, and not merely voidable.”
- “A mere marriage ceremony between a man and a woman, where one of them has a living wife or husband, is not a marriage at all. Such a marriage is absolutely void, and not merely voidable”
- “A mere marriage ceremony between a man and a woman, where one of them has a living wife or husband, is not a marriage at all. Such a marriage is absolutely void, and not merely voidable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fishburne, Baker, Stukes, Tayeor, Oxner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adams v. Texfi IndustriesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 34×
- Dawson v. Hatfield Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-07-26· cited 25×
- Insurance Co. of North America v. JewelCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1968-10-10· cited 22×
- Adams v. Texfi IndustriesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-03· cited 17×
- Kendall v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-31· cited 17×
- Johns v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-07-13· cited 16×
- Palm v. General Painting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-06· cited 10×
- Lukich v. LukichCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-30· cited 10×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-10-01· cited 8×
- Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-01-18· cited 7×
- Ligon v. Metropolian Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-03-27· cited 6×
- Brown v. Sojourner (In re Estate of Brown)Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-07-25· cited 6×
- Lukich v. LukichSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-09-08· cited 5×
- Day v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesD. South Carolina· 1981-08-11· cited 4×
- Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement PlanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-08-28· cited 3×
- Clouse v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceE.D. South Carolina· 1964-08-22· cited 3×
- Joye v. YonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 2×
- South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. YoungCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-05-29· cited 1×
- Adams v. Texfi IndustriesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-23· cited 1×
- York v. Longlands PlantationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-03-04
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.