District of Columbia· 1/10/2014
Davis v. United States
Citations
- 973 F. Supp. 2d 23
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2978
- 2014 WL 98635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “because plaintiff did not bring her discrimination claims against the proper defendant . . . the Court has no choice but to dismiss her discrimination claims for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction”
- finding same and also noting that 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c) “does not seem to distinguish IIED from other intentional torts on its face[.]”
- dismissing FTCA claims pursuant to FECA, without discussing whether plaintiff sought Secretary’s determination
- “It is well-established that under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, an individual may not bring a tort claim against the federal government absent an explicit waiver by Congress.”
- FECA coverage precludes suit under the FTCA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-26· cited 26×
- Magowan v. LoweryDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-29· cited 21×
- Johnson v. United States GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-31· cited 16×
- Jones v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 8×
- Outterbridge v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-07
- Gilliard v. GruenbergDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-26
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-27
- Manning v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2019-01-22
- Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits SectionDistrict of Columbia· 2023-03-11
- Whitaker v. United State of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-04
- Lacy v. ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-12
- Hayman v. Bldg Metro Capital LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-13
- Auld v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-20
- Vuyyuru v. ReddyDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-21
- Ahmed v. GableDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-25
- Searcy v. VilsackDistrict of Columbia· 2024-05-14
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 4,884×
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 4,367×
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 590×
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 582×
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1986-10-06· cited 412×
- Stewart, Sonya v. Evans, Donald L.D.C. Circuit· 2002-01-11· cited 363×
- Barbour, Joyce A. v. Browner, Carol M.D.C. Circuit· 1999-07-13· cited 254×
- Khadr v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2008-06-20· cited 244×
- Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionD.C. Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 240×
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict of Columbia· 1999-11-19· cited 188×
- Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1996-07-30· cited 139×
- Loughlin, Thomas P. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2004-12-21· cited 91×
- DeWITT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-05-10· cited 38×
- Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict of Columbia· 2008-07-02· cited 32×
- Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-04· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.