Skip to main content
· 1/5/1993

Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 598
  • 296 U.S. App. D.C. 231
  • 1992 WL 126540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “litigants may bring under the APA statutory and constitutional claims for specific relief in federal district court”
  • recognizing that “litigants may bring under the APA statutory and constitutional claims for specific relief in federal district court”
  • holding that “no alternative remedy” requirement of section 704 was met where plaintiff framed its contract relief in terms of specific performance or rescission
  • ruling that the district court “did not have jurisdiction over [the plaintiff’s] pure contract claims” but properly considered the merits of the plaintiff’s statutory and due process claims against the United States
  • concluding that regulatory measures \actually aggravat[ed] the decline\
  • concluding that regulatory measures “actually aggravated] the decline”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Wald, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.