· 1/5/1993
Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision
Citations
- 967 F.2d 598
- 296 U.S. App. D.C. 231
- 1992 WL 126540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “litigants may bring under the APA statutory and constitutional claims for specific relief in federal district court”
- recognizing that “litigants may bring under the APA statutory and constitutional claims for specific relief in federal district court”
- holding that “no alternative remedy” requirement of section 704 was met where plaintiff framed its contract relief in terms of specific performance or rescission
- ruling that the district court “did not have jurisdiction over [the plaintiff’s] pure contract claims” but properly considered the merits of the plaintiff’s statutory and due process claims against the United States
- concluding that regulatory measures \actually aggravat[ed] the decline\
- concluding that regulatory measures “actually aggravated] the decline”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mikva, Wald, Buckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.