Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment when “the record clearly established] that the [employer] communicated its expectations to [the employee] long before he was terminated”
• deferring to the employer’s decision of “what nondiscriminatory qualities it will seek in filling the . . . position”
• affirming summary judgment and holding that “[plaintiff] must do more than challenge the judgment of his superiors through his own self-interested assertions.”
• affirming summary judgment and holding that “[plaintiff] must do more than challenge the judgment of his superiors through his own self-interested assertions.”
• explaining 11 that “[plaintiff] must do more than challenge the judgment of [her] superiors through [her] own self-interested assertions.”
• affirming summary judgment for employer, who had communicated expectations to employee prior to the termination, and holding that “[plaintiff] must do more than challenge the judgment of his superiors through his own self- interested assertions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).