Skip to main content

Carrillo v. State

Citations

  • 2 S.W.3d 275
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 95
  • 1999 WL 722241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in the constitution or statutes suggests that continued presence of the indictment [or information] in the file or courtroom is necessary in order to maintain already vested jurisdiction .”
  • “We agreed with the State [in Davis], clarifying that jurisdiction should generally be viewed as vested in courts, not judges. Unlike subject matter jurisdiction in a court, the authority of a judge is not jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.