Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant not prejudiced by incorrect jury instruction when error “increased the State’s burden by adding another element to be proved”
• in a conviction for, among other things, possession of obscene graphics on a CD-ROM, the State need only prove defendant is aware of character and nature of material
• CD-ROM discs contained “photographic produces] ” within meaning of obscenity statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. Gracey
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-04-21· cited 68×
• Anderson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-12-21· cited 38×
• Byrd v. Caswell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-10-16· cited 22×
• Perry v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-18· cited 22×
• State v. Rosul
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-19· cited 16×
• State v. Carruth
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-10-23· cited 6×
• State v. Brady
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-06-30· cited 4×
• HAMILTON v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-06-01· cited 3×
• IN RE: ADOPTION OF THE 2026 REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL (SECOND EDITION)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2026-03-06

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Roth v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
• Miller v. California
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
• Stanley v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
• Osborne v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
• Spuehler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-12-02· cited 534×
• United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. Film
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 524×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
• Valdez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-03-15· cited 129×
• McGregor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-06· cited 119×
• Salazar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-04-29· cited 94×
• Drew v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-02-28· cited 61×
• Shultz v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-08· cited 45×
• Hanf v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-02-07· cited 37×
• Jordan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-10-05· cited 33×
• Lopp v. Lopp
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 29×
• Morrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1980-09-03· cited 25×
• Moss v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-22· cited 21×
• State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Freeman
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-07-03· cited 18×