State v. Rosul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, \Washington’s statutory scheme prohibiting possession of child pornography does not require as an element of the crime that a defendant know the age of the persons depicted in the material he is charged with possessing\
• “Such a showing defeats overbreadth challenges by ensuring that innocent possessors of child pornography do not face prosecution.”
• \Such a showing defeats overbreadth challenges by ensuring that innocent possessors of child pornography do not face prosecution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).