New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 6/30/2000
State v. Brady
Citations
- 753 A.2d 1175
- 332 N.J. Super. 445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statutory amendment including computer program or file was intended to clarify existing law rather than change substantive law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Havey, A.A. Rodriguez and Collester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
- Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-07-19· cited 160×
- In Re the Suspension or Revocation of the Certificate of HellerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-01-20· cited 109×
- State v. LashinskySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-07-23· cited 105×
- In Re the Suspension or Revocation of the License of DeMarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-02· cited 76×
- State v. SaundersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-06-23· cited 48×
- State v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 21×
- State v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-01-29· cited 19×
- William H. Goldberg & Co. v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-03-05· cited 17×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-04-12· cited 13×
- People v. FraserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-16· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.