Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 11/20/2017

David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCI

Citations

  • 876 F.3d 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Rule 4(a)(3) is not jurisdictional because it “is not a creature of statute, but a court-promulgated rule”
  • holding that the petitioner exhausted his federal due process claim on PCRA review
  • concluding the period for filing a cross-appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(3) is not jurisdictional because it is not derived from a statute
  • noting that the question of whether FRAP 4(a)(3) is jurisdictional “has divided the Courts of Appeals
  • following Bronshtein where the jury convicted the defendant of conspiracy to commit first degree murder
  • giving AEDPA deference and upholding the state court’s conclusion that ambiguous jury instructions did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Krause, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named David Mathias v. Superintendent Frackville SCI

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.