Skip to main content

Candler v. State

Citations

  • 837 N.E.2d 1100
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2263
  • 2005 WL 3274790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statutes of repose prevent stale claims from springing up and surprising parties when the evidence has been lost
  • statute of repose for medical malpractice, G. L. c. 260, § 4, not subject to equitable estoppel or tolling due to fraudulent concealment
  • principle of judicial restraint includes recognition of inability and undesirability of judiciary substituting its notions of correct policy for that of popularly elected Legislature
  • “[W]e are bound by our Supreme Court’s decisions[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sullivan, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.