Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2/13/1991
Davenport v. State
Citations
- 806 P.2d 655
- 1991 WL 11063
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that child accommodation syndrome must be generally accepted as reliable in medical community
- concluding that ”[t]his Court has the right to make an independent search of appropriate medical and legal doctrines to determine if the [child accommodation] syndrome is generally accepted and meets the proper test.”
- concluding that \[t]his Court has the right to make an independent search of appropriate medical and legal doctrines to determine if the [child accommodation] syndrome is generally accepted and meets the proper test.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Lane, Lumpkin, Brett, Parks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Parker v. ScottTenth Circuit· 2005-01-05· cited 151×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- Anthony Jerome Harris v. Ron Champion, Warden Susan Brimmer Loving , Attorney General for the State of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1991-07-19· cited 77×
- Bechtel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-09-02· cited 65×
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-12-17· cited 51×
- Frenzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 50×
- Newkirk v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 41×
- Perez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 38×
- Sanderson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 33×
- King v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-10-29· cited 33×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-12-29· cited 32×
- Huskey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-01-08· cited 27×
- Luna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-04-08· cited 27×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-07-19· cited 17×
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-09-26· cited 15×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-02-05· cited 5×
- Wetmore v. AddisonTenth Circuit· 2005-03-17
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Gary CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-07-25
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Spuehler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-12-02· cited 534×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- People v. BowkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-29· cited 271×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-04-03· cited 204×
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 189×
- State v. LindseyArizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 175×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-05-30· cited 119×
- Townsend v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1987-05-13· cited 111×
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-30· cited 97×
- Driskell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1983-02-16· cited 95×
- Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 89×
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-06-11· cited 87×
- People v. KoonColorado Court of Appeals· 1986-05-08· cited 74×
- Rawlings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-06-29· cited 71×
- Lantrip v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1986-05-22· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-06· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.