Skip to main content

King v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 472 S.W.3d 523
  • 2015 Ky. LEXIS 1940
  • 2015 WL 6559611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]he validity of the theory was not self-evident in 1985 and it is not self- evident today”
  • holding the delayed disclosure testimony was improperly admitted because the validity of CSAAS was not self-evident nor validated through a Daubert analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Barber, Cunningham, Keller, Minton, Noble, Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.