Nevada Supreme Court· 11/3/2003

Daniel v. State

Citations

78 P.3d 890
119 Nev. 498
119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 56
2003 Nev. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that defendants have a right to a fair trial by an impartial jury
concluding that the victim's character is not an essential element of self- defense for purposes of NRS 48.055(2), which allows proof of specific instances of a person's character when that character is an essential element of a claim or defense
recognizing that the failure to record part of the proceedings is not grounds for reversal in and of itself but an appellant must demonstrate the missing record was so significant that the appellate court could not meaningfully review the appeal
indicating that the district court's improper exclusion of evidence of the victim's propensity for violence is subject to harmless error review
reiterating that for a preservation-of-evidence claim, the exculpatory value of the evidence must be apparent before its loss or destruction
indicating that the district court’s improper exclusion of evidence of the 6 victim’s propensity for violence is subject to harmless error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.