United States v. Ronald Keiser, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that the model jury instructions accurately state the elements of self-defense in this circuit
• “Keiser makes no claim on appeal that the [victim’s violent] incident . . . — which . . . occurred after the shooting — was relevant to his state of mind at the time of the shooting or the reasonableness of his belief that force in self- defense was necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).