Cunningham v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an ambiguity in the record where the areas of concern “may have” contributed to plaintiff’s failure of selection is construed against the defendant for failure to prove a lack substantial nexus between the error and the non-selections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniel A. Lindsay v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 428×
• Roth v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-04-15· cited 8×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Orloff v. Willoughby
  Supreme Court· 1953-04-06· cited 957×
• Victoria M. Voge v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1988-04-19· cited 265×
• James L. Murphy v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1993-07-19· cited 245×
• Terrence L. Adkins v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 197×
• Skinner v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-02-21· cited 182×
• Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the Army
  Federal Circuit· 1993-04-14· cited 159×
• Hary v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1980-03-19· cited 109×
• Richard A. Weiss v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1969-03-14· cited 67×
• Gerald F. Arens v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-16· cited 52×
• Engels v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1982-05-05· cited 45×
• Etheredge v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1985-09-26· cited 5×
• Womack v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1996-02-07· cited 3×