Supreme Court· 4/23/1984

Cunningham v. United States

Citations

466 U.S. 951
104 S. Ct. 2154
80 L. Ed. 2d 540
52 U.S.L.W. 3776
1984 U.S. LEXIS 1964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding, inter alia, that failure to move to suppress evidence prior to trial as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(f) constituted a procedural bar to a § 2255 motion unless defendant could show cause and prejudice
\[T]he ICC regulations ... make a carrier liable to the public for negligent acts of the vehicle's driver....\
denial of severance “will be reversed only upon the appellant’s successfully assuming the heavy burden of showing that he suffered substantial prejudice due to joint trial”
“[T]he ICC regulations ... make a carrier liable to the public for negligent acts of the vehicle’s driver_”
“[W]e do not suggest that an attorney-client privilege is lost by the mere fact that the information communicated is otherwise available to the public. The privilege attaches not to the information but to the communication of the information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cunningham v. United States

98 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.