United States v. Noel Alvarado and Mayra Sanabria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that redacting statement by substituting words “another person” for codefendant’s name did not violate rule of completeness
• holding that redacting statement by substituting words \another person\ for codefendant's name did not violate rule of completeness
• holding no reversible error for refusal to sever where \trial judge repeatedly cautioned the jurors to consider the evidence separately with respect to each defendant\
• rejecting claim that curtailment of cross-examination with respect to redacted statement violated defendant’s confrontation rights
• rejecting claim that curtailment of cross-examination with respect to redacted statement violated defendant's confrontation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).