Second Circuit· 6/16/2011

United States v. O'Connor

Citations

650 F.3d 839
85 Fed. R. Serv. 781
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12388
2011 WL 2417143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that there was “no reason to believe that [the co-defendant] would waive his Fifth Amendment privilege in order to testify” on the defendant’s behalf
reviewing district court's decision to admit evidence pursuant to Rule 414 for abuse of discretion
distinguishing between an attorney seeking to avoid appointment in the first place and one seeking to withdraw following proper appointment
defendant provided \no inkling of what helpful information might have been found” during a continuance sought to investigate \surprise testimony”
defendant provided “no inkling of what helpful information might have been found’’ during a continuance sought to investigate “suiprise testimony”
no abuse of discretion in admission of evidence of sexual acts that occurred 30 years earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Pooler, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.